trywaterfall

Daniel Parker

2 min read

·

23-02-2025

1

0

Share

TryWaterfall isn't a formally defined methodology like Scrum or Kanban. Instead, it describes a pragmatic approach that blends elements of Agile and Waterfall methodologies. This hybrid approach aims to leverage the strengths of both while mitigating their weaknesses. This article will explore what TryWaterfall entails, its benefits, drawbacks, and when it might be the right choice for your project.

Understanding the TryWaterfall Approach

TryWaterfall acknowledges the limitations of purely Waterfall projects, particularly their inflexibility and late detection of problems. It also recognizes that a purely Agile approach isn't suitable for every project. Some projects require a more structured, predictable timeline.

The core idea behind TryWaterfall is to start with a Waterfall-like approach, focusing on detailed planning and upfront design. However, unlike traditional Waterfall, TryWaterfall incorporates iterative development cycles and feedback loops. This allows for adjustments and course corrections as the project progresses, preventing major deviations late in the process.

Think of it as a series of mini-Waterfall projects within a larger project framework. Each mini-Waterfall focuses on a specific deliverable or feature. After each iteration, the team reviews progress, gathers feedback, and makes necessary changes before moving on to the next iteration.

Key Characteristics of TryWaterfall:

• Phased Approach: The project is broken down into phases, similar to Waterfall.
• Iterative Development: Each phase includes iterative development cycles.
• Feedback Loops: Regular feedback is incorporated throughout the project.
• Flexibility: Allows for adjustments based on feedback and changing requirements.
• Transparency: Progress is visible and tracked throughout each phase.

When is TryWaterfall a Suitable Approach?

TryWaterfall can be a good fit for projects that:

• Require a degree of predictability: While offering flexibility, it still provides a structured timeline.
• Have a relatively well-defined scope: While adjustments are possible, the project should have a clear starting point and general goals.
• Need a balance between planning and flexibility: It combines the structured planning of Waterfall with the flexibility of Agile.
• Benefit from early feedback: The iterative approach allows for early identification and resolution of issues.

Benefits of Using TryWaterfall

• Reduced Risk: Early feedback loops minimize the risk of major problems later in the project.
• Increased Flexibility: Allows for changes and adjustments as needed.
• Improved Collaboration: Encourages communication and collaboration between stakeholders.
• Better Quality: Iterative testing and feedback improve the overall quality of the product.
• Enhanced Stakeholder Satisfaction: Regular updates and feedback keep stakeholders informed and involved.

Drawbacks of TryWaterfall

• Complexity: Managing a hybrid approach can be more complex than sticking to a single methodology.
• Potential for Scope Creep: The flexibility can lead to scope creep if not managed carefully.
• Requires Experienced Teams: Successful implementation requires a team experienced in both Agile and Waterfall.
• Difficult to Scale: Scaling TryWaterfall to very large projects can be challenging.

TryWaterfall vs. Pure Agile & Waterfall

Conclusion: Is TryWaterfall Right for You?

TryWaterfall presents a middle ground between the rigid structure of Waterfall and the flexibility of Agile. Whether it's the right choice for your project depends on several factors, including project size, complexity, team experience, and stakeholder expectations. Careful consideration of these factors is crucial before deciding to adopt a TryWaterfall approach. Remember to thoroughly evaluate your project's unique needs to determine the best methodology or hybrid approach. Often, a pilot project using TryWaterfall can help you determine its suitability for larger endeavors.